On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:31:16PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:26:45AM -0600, Curtis Jewell wrote: > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:22 +0100, hv@crypt.org wrote: > > > hv@crypt.org wrote: > > > :Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ::$ ./perl -Ilib/ -e 'sort glob("*")' > > > ::Segmentation fault > > > : > > > :I get the same result with gcc-4.5.0 here, only with -Dusemultiplicity. > > > [...] > > > :I'll try to distil this down to a bug report for gcc. > > > > > > Now submitted as <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44081>. > > > > And already marked as invalid there (it may have been distilled too far > > for them to notice the bug?) > > I suspect that the reader/rejector assumed that the indexes for notnull() > start at 0. They start at 1. If you make that mistake, you would conclude > (wrongly) what the rejector did. Gah. I think I'm wrong here. I'm not convinced that the test case is correct. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next