Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization

Hello,

Updated version:

* C89 fix
* updates for a test that uses B::Concise

While testing a simple benchmark script I noticed that threaded
version is 25% faster. I suspect that the code may be is not thread
safe, however don't know anything about perl threads.

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Vincent Pit <perl@profvince.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this patch. At first glance it looks correct.
>
> Except for a nit, actually : you need to keep the declaration of argop at
> the beginning of the block. C89 doesn't allow mixed declaration and code.
>
> Vincent.
>
>



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.

• [PATCH] shift; optimization by Ruslan Zakirov
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Vincent Pit
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Vincent Pit
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Ruslan Zakirov
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Ruslan Zakirov
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Vincent Pit
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Reini Urban
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Ruslan Zakirov
• RE: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Jan Dubois
• Re: [PATCH] shift; optimization by Reini Urban
• PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT (Was: [PATCH] shift; optimization) by Steffen Mueller
• RE: PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT (Was: [PATCH] shift; optimization) by Jan Dubois
• Re: PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT (Was: [PATCH] shift; optimization) by Steffen Mueller
• RE: PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT (Was: [PATCH] shift; optimization) by Jan Dubois
• Re: PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT (Was: [PATCH] shift; optimization) by Ben Morrow
• Re: PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT (Was: [PATCH] shift; optimization) by Greg Lindahl