On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:56 PM, karl williamson wrote: > To summarize, I propose that we use Unicode's XID_Start and > XID_Continue properties in 5.14, even though that breaks one of our > tests, and possibly existing code. Would we change the meanings of is_utf8_idcont and is_utf8_idfirst, or introduce new functions? In anticipation of this change, I’ve attached a patch that corrects the test in utf8.t to use ¡ instead of ·. I’ve also moved the test outside of the eval, so it will still run (and fail) if the compilation fails, instead of causing an invalid test count.Thread Previous | Thread Next