Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Steffen Schwigon <ss5@renormalist.net>wrote:

> Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Maik Hentsche <maik@mm-double.de>
> wrote:> Also, adding it three times may be an overkill. Personally don't
> > think adding it to the system() documentation too adds much. You
> > shouldn't be thinking about this when using system(), you should
> > when using wait() IMO.
>
> Agreed.
>

That assumes system isn't added to the program later on, but that's a minor
point compared to the following: The error become apparent when system
starts returning an error. As far as I'm concerned, system is the most
important to place information about its incompatibility with SIGCHLD
handlers.

• [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Maik Hentsche
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Maik Hentsche
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Leon Timmermans
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Maik Hentsche
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Eric Brine
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Maik Hentsche
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Steffen Schwigon
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Eric Brine
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Eric Brine
• Re: [PATCH] Attempt at improving the perlipc docs by Zefram