On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:51:16PM +0200, Vincent Pit wrote: > It's not suitable for 5.12.1 because the POPEVAL() public macro is > changed in such a way third-party extensions that use it need to declare > the new "namesv" variable. But it would be suitable, I think, for 5.12.1, to keep the existing POPEVAL macro, add this corrected version under a new name, and change all the core's C code to use the new version. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next