develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2010

Re: [perl.git] branch blead, updated. v5.12.0-49-gcfbab81

Thread Next
From:
Jesse Vincent
Date:
April 15, 2010 08:38
Subject:
Re: [perl.git] branch blead, updated. v5.12.0-49-gcfbab81
Message ID:
20100415153738.GF5084@fsck.bestpractical.com



On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:35:34AM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> Author: Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgs@consttype.org>
> Date:   Thu Apr 15 09:35:07 2010 +0200
> 
>     Upgrade to CGI.pm 3.49

So, our policy says that we shouldn't be sending this whole update back
to maint. But there _is_ a security fix in there, as well as a
regression that seems "important" to deal with for maint.

Do we want to cherry-pick just those bits? Since there's so little
actually _in_ this update other than those bits, do we just want to take
the whole module?

Is this bikeshed teal or or cornflower blue?

-Jesse

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About