Re: Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug?

> Burak Gürsoy wrote:

Burak: can you alter the tables in use in before compiling, to make a
TurkPerl? If you can, the "turkish patch" would be useful to anyone
else in your situation, and (I'm not an authority on this) might make
sense as part of the distribution as a compile-time switch, -DTURKISH
or something.

• Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug? by Burak Gürsoy
• Re: Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug? by karl williamson
• RE: Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug? by Burak Gürsoy
• Re: Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug? by karl williamson
• Re: Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug? by David Nicol
• Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug?) by karl williamson
• RE: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug?) by Burak Gürsoy
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} abug?) by karl williamson
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug?) by demerphq
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} abug?) by karl williamson
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug?) by demerphq
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} abug?) by karl williamson
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} abug?) by karl williamson
• Re: Running Perl 5 on Turkish (Was : Is lc(\x{130}) -> i\x{307} a bug?) by demerphq