Jan Dubois wrote: > On Mon, 08 Mar 2010, Nicholas Clark wrote: >> However, even 7-14Mb doesn't scare me. On any demand paged OS, if it's not >> used, it's not paged in. I doubt that we have any platform where we're that >> tight on virtual memory space for executables. > > It is also a little bit of an issue for people who distribute stand-alone > applications written in Perl and bundled into a single executable with tools > like PAR, PerlApp or Perl2Exe. > > Right now you can fine tune the size of your bundled Unicode support by > for example removing the 4 big tables for the major Asian scripts and > still have Unicode support for all the European languages. Having just one > huge table would likely make this impossible. > > Having such a big footprint is also a huge drag on application startup > time if they have to extract the table to disk every time the application is > run (yes, you can leave the files behind in a cache area, but some people > prefer not to leave stuff behind when the application exits). > As a compromise measure, couldn't these tables be dynamically loaded on demand? I would guess that Perl already has a mechanism to do this, but if not, a malloc and copy from disk would work. > I would also be curious how good those 7-14MB could be compressed, as that > too would make a big difference for the actual filesize of packaged apps. > > Cheers, > -Jan >Thread Previous | Thread Next