Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2010
Should this be added as a test under t/porting? On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:34, Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> wrote: > In perl.git, the branch blead has been updated > > <http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/a45a6dbc08e2d955a291bbec2304e04bf4a25c14?hp=f60ef620372ddc56bbd9386726c9ec06054980e3> > > - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- > commit a45a6dbc08e2d955a291bbec2304e04bf4a25c14 > Author: Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> > Date: Tue Jan 26 17:31:52 2010 +0100 > > Check for Maintainers.pl updates > > Make Porting/check-cpan-pollution test whether a given, presumably safe > commit to dual-lived modules also updated Porting/Maintainers.pl. > > M Porting/check-cpan-pollution > > commit 69c406f30530804d323330c2addaad54290ef3b8 > Author: Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> > Date: Tue Jan 26 17:23:38 2010 +0100 > > Porting/ tool: Check for bad commits against cpan/ > > Porting/check-cpan-pollution runs a series of tests to find potentially > unsafe commits that change dual-lived modules and prints a summary. > > A Porting/check-cpan-pollutionThread Next