Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2009
On Aug 30, 2009, at 1:40 PM, David Golden wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Yuval > Kogman<nothingmuch@woobling.org> wrote: >> IMHO the logical next step is to use submodules[1] for the >> directories >> in ext/, allowing the maintainers to keep separate repositories for >> each core module in the main git server. > > After reading all the debate, I think the logical next step is to use > submodule/subtree for *ONE* directory in ext and see how that goes and > what we learn from it. so submodules mean that my repository history is retained, whereas subtrees retain the history of my modules as seen from the perl repository? sub-trees imply to me that patches can't be pulled directly from my repository. I may be wrong though. -- Tim Jenness Joint Astronomy CentreThread Previous | Thread Next