Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2009
On Tuesday, August 25, 2009, at 10:12AM, "Nicholas Clark" <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: >On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: >> Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch e00b8fdab69f4407fc00c983beddd087eb4e3205 blead-1995-ge00b8fd > >That commit hash doesn't exist, which makes it rather tricky for me to work >out what your smoker has got to. (Although I think from the failures below, >it has tested blead with those changes to t/TEST to remove File::Spec) Yes, I saw your change on gitweb before kicking off a smoke run. >Does anyone have a good idea where that hash is coming from? See Dave M.'s previous post to p5p with a subject line similar to "smokers 20 commits ahead of blead" or something like that and my post of a couple of days ago on fiveperl about the rsync mirror getting further and further ahead of the main git repo in number of commits but without differences in the code. Well, actually you don't need to see those posts because they ask essentially the same question you are asking. Until someone who knows where the rsync repo is located and/or how it does its updates steps up and takes a look at what's going on we'll continue to have useless SHA1s in the smoke reports.Thread Next