develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2009

Re: p5 on the JVM

Thread Previous
David Nicol
August 21, 2009 11:21
Re: p5 on the JVM
Message ID:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:36 AM, James Laver<> wrote

> Because a simplified perl that didn't have these problems just
> wouldn't be perl. We had a good discussion about it and it seemed that
> it would have to be radically different.

I am curious as to the grounds on which your discussion rejected the
notion of following the LisP model where there is a minimal core that
builds all the fancier stuff out of macros, if it even came up.  I am
a proponent of applying that model to reengineering-of-perl planning
and would like to hear the flaws you found in that approach if it was

Thread Previous Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About