On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:37:08PM -0400, Eric Brine wrote: > The problem with having implicit dereference is that you end up overusing > "map \$_," Whatever else is going on, we do already have C<\LIST> for that: DB<1> x \(1,2,3) 0 SCALAR(0x96fab88) -> 1 1 SCALAR(0x96fa7c8) -> 2 2 SCALAR(0x96fa948) -> 3 In not necessarily unrelated news, the Perl 6 design is as always worth considering. Last I checked, the RHS of Perl 6's := had to be a "capture", which has the syntax C<\LIST>. Coincidence ... or Conspiracy?! More on this later. -- Chip SalzenbergThread Previous | Thread Next