Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2009
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote:
> So please everyone, test away!
>
I installed rc1++ last nite, now running cpan> shell,
installing bundles, upgrading, etc..
everything looks good, but one oddity caught my eye:
In the following log-fragment, it erroneously says
this.
"Since we're running under CPANPLUS"
but I was running perl -MCPAN -eshell
Curiously, it happened only 2x, to these modules.
CPAN.pm: Going to build G/GB/GBARR/perl-ldap-0.39.tar.gz
CPAN.pm: Going to build D/DO/DONEILL/MIME-tools-5.427.tar.gz
One common characteristic is that they both do
interactive dependency management, letting user select additional
components.
perl-ldap-0.39/t/common.pl
perl-ldap-0.39/test.cfg
Prepending /home/jimc/.cpan/build/Text-Glob-0.08-757COB/blib/arch
/home/jimc/.cpan/build/Text-Glob-0.08-757COB/blib/lib /home/jimc/.cpan/build
/ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.2603-q2xdhN/blib/arch
/home/jimc/.cpan/build/ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.2603-q2xdhN/blib/lib to PERL5LIB
for 'make'
CPAN.pm: Going to build G/GB/GBARR/perl-ldap-0.39.tar.gz
*** Module::AutoInstall version 1.03
*** Checking for Perl dependencies...
[Core Features]
- Convert::ASN1 ...missing. (would need 0.07)
==> Auto-install the 1 mandatory module(s) from CPAN? [y]
[SASL authentication]
- Authen::SASL ...missing. (would need 2.00)
==> Auto-install the 1 optional module(s) from CPAN? [n] y
[LDAP URLs]
- URI::ldap ...loaded. (1.11 >= 1.1)
[LDAPS]
- IO::Socket::SSL ...loaded. (1.24 >= 0.81)
[Read/Write DSML files]
- MIME::Base64 ...loaded. (3.08)
- XML::SAX::Writer ...missing.
==> Auto-install the 1 optional module(s) from CPAN? [n] y
[Read/Write LDIF files]
- MIME::Base64 ...loaded. (3.08)
*** Since we're running under CPANPLUS, I'll just let it take care
of the dependency's installation later.
*** Module::AutoInstall configuration finished.
*** Since we're running under CPANPLUS, I'll just let it take care
of the dependency's installation later.
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Im pretty sure Ive seen these before, and they werent errors anyway.
so the only noteworthy thing (other than general success)
is the CPANPLUS message.
Ill be doing a cpan> recompile soon.
hth