Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1

On 7/27/09 3:37 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> Is it intended that the version.pm file shipped with 5.10.1 (that
> identifies itself as 0.77), should differ considerably from the file
> version.pm obtained from the version-0.77.tar.gz file on CPAN?
>
>    
Yes, the bleadperl/5.10.1 version.pm does not need all of that eval{} 
nonsense, because we "know" that the XS code will always work (since it 
is compiled into Perl itself).

John

• [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock
• [PATCH] Final release of version-0.77 for inclusion in 5.10.1 by John Peacock