Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2009
2009/7/26 Linda W <perl-diddler@tlinx.org>: > demerphq wrote: >> >> 2009/7/25 Linda W <perl-diddler@tlinx.org>: >>> >>> Is it purposeful or an unintentional omission (bug?), that the 'o' >>> operator is missing from the list of flags. >> >> Intentional i think. /o is deprecated more or less. > > --- > Intentional? That certainly hasn't been made clear -- not to mention > it does have _limited_ usefulness (though can cause > confusion if you don't understand the concept. > > >>> Also, as the manpage is really just about regex's, and not the >>> replacement part of an 's' command, maybe the 'e' command not being >>> mentioned is not a omission, however, it's a bit odd that it would >>> occur in a mention of perlreref then (personally I think it might be >>> friendly/helpful to mention it in both places, but 'technically', one >>> might consider it not belonging in either...snort; I prefer >>> helpful...:-). >> >> Hmm, doc patch to see what you think would be better would be a good idea. > > --- > "doc patch", is that a verb? I'm not familiar with how to do > that action. ;~? Modify document, create patch, send it to us. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next