Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2009
On Fri, July 24, 2009 5:28 pm, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Fri, July 24, 2009 3:44 pm, Eric Brine wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: >>> Yes, although I'm not 100% sure that pp_given does exactly the right >>> thing with the pad. List::Util::first needs to assign to the lexical >>> $_ in the pad if there is one. >> >> How are the Pure Perl implementation of List::Util and countless other >> Perl (&) subs suppose to do that? > > Add a reference to the proper $_ to the caller() return list? Err, never mind, that wouldn't tell you what $_ was in scope of the sub if the sub wasn't in the caller's scope.Thread Previous | Thread Next