On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez < rgarciasuarez@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/24 Dave Mitchell wrote: > > So if I've understood this correctly, given() adds a lexical $_ to the > > scope, and there's a bug in List::Util::first in that it doesn't work > with > > a lexical $_? So not a bug in given/smartmatch? > > Yes, although I'm not 100% sure that pp_given does exactly the right > thing with the pad. List::Util::first needs to assign to the lexical $_ > in the pad if there is one. > How are the Pure Perl implementation of List::Util and countless other Perl (&) subs suppose to do that?Thread Previous | Thread Next