On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:17:16PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:59:18AM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > I don't imagine Dave would disagree that maint is pulling in too much stuff. > > $DEITY, after the delay on 5.10.1, a person could be forgiven for wishing > > for a separate "critical-maint" branch. And that's just nuts. > > What Dave actually thinks is that he'd like to have a good long discussion > about this once 5.10.1 is out of the door ... Fair enough; consider the question of your opinion on this tabled. For my part, I've tested the 5.10.1 snapshot (successfully) with some DarkPAN code, and will attempt to resolve some of http://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Search/Simple.html?Query=MemberOf%3D66092+and+status!=%27resolved%27 which is a list of 5.10 bugs any core hacker would do well to look at. -- Chip SalzenbergThread Previous