2009/7/23 Steve Peters <steve@fisharerojo.org>: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Ricardo > SIGNES<perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: >> >> Talking about Perl 5 git repo tonight, some questions came up about where >> development really happens. This patch is a bit of clarification about >> where/why patches go to blead/maint. >> >> -- > > I'm not entirely sure about this patch. Rarely should a patch ever be > applied directly to maint without hitting blead first. I can only > think of one case where I had a patch applied to maint only and that > was due to API differences between blead and maint. I'd rather that > patches be pointed at blead than at maint without being directed by > the appropriate pumpking. Chip has already applied it, although with another commit message, with a workflow leak somehow: http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/7f4ffa9dba4691a2cd3285cfb3fd76f6f6bd661Thread Previous | Thread Next