On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Ricardo SIGNES<perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > > Talking about Perl 5 git repo tonight, some questions came up about where > development really happens. This patch is a bit of clarification about > where/why patches go to blead/maint. > > -- I'm not entirely sure about this patch. Rarely should a patch ever be applied directly to maint without hitting blead first. I can only think of one case where I had a patch applied to maint only and that was due to API differences between blead and maint. I'd rather that patches be pointed at blead than at maint without being directed by the appropriate pumpking. Steve Peters steve@fisharerojo.orgThread Previous | Thread Next