Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2009
> This is extremely neat. > However by looking at the perly.y part of the patch (I haven't looked > at the other ones yet) I see that you add switch as a derivation for > the term rule, but switch can begin with a label. And terms don't. > > I'd rather have a new rule > switch : label given; > and add given to term. > The problem in this approach is that it makes bison complain about some reduce/reduce conflicts. I'm unsure if those are genuine or not. If someone wants to have a look, the amended patch is attached. Vincent.Thread Previous | Thread Next