develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2009

Smoke [5.11.0] blead-1594-gf6af439 FAIL(XF) linux 2.6.28-13-generic[debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) (fwd)

From:
George Greer
Date:
July 16, 2009 19:14
Subject:
Smoke [5.11.0] blead-1594-gf6af439 FAIL(XF) linux 2.6.28-13-generic[debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) (fwd)
Message ID:
alpine.LFD.2.00.0907162208560.1355@ein.m-l.org
I keep getting intermittant failures on ext/threads-shared/t/waithires.t 
in both blead and maint-5.10 on Ubuntu 64-bit (SMP). For example, below.

(Also the "Benchmark.t" failure is really annoying because I can't set it 
to auto-Cc: p5p without being spammy.  Can't really guarantee my system 
will be accurate within a half second with all the other smoking running 
too.)

-George Greer

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:02 -0400
From: George Greer <perl@greerga.m-l.org>
To: smokers-reports@perl.org
Subject: Smoke [5.11.0] blead-1594-gf6af439 FAIL(XF) linux 2.6.28-13-generic
     [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu)

Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch f6af439460e2114a6bac2d09c6f38b7cfc8589fe blead-1594-gf6af439
zwei: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (GenuineIntel 2668MHz) (x86_64/8 cpu)
     on        linux - 2.6.28-13-generic [debian]
     using     cc version 4.3.3
     smoketime 11 hours 36 minutes (average 43 minutes 31 seconds)

Summary: FAIL(XF)

O = OK  F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
X = Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness
? = still running or test results not (yet) available
Build failures during:       - = unknown or N/A
c = Configure, m = make, M = make (after miniperl), t = make test-prep

blead-1594-gf6af439  Configuration (common) none
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------
O O O O O O
O O O O O O -Duse64bitint
O X O O O X -Duselongdouble
O O O O O O -Dusemorebits
X O O O O O -Duseithreads
O O O O O O -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint
X F X O F X -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
X F X O O X -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
| | | | | +- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8 -DDEBUGGING
| | | | +--- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING
| | | +----- PERLIO = stdio  -DDEBUGGING
| | +------- LC_ALL = en_US.utf8
| +--------- PERLIO = perlio
+----------- PERLIO = stdio

Locally applied patches:
     SMOKEf6af439460e2114a6bac2d09c6f38b7cfc8589fe

Failures: (common-args) none
[perlio] -Duselongdouble
[en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duselongdouble
[en_US.utf8] -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
[en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness):
     ../lib/Benchmark.t......................FAILED at test 13

[stdio] -Duseithreads
[stdio] -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
[stdio/en_US.utf8] -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness):
     ../ext/threads-shared/t/waithires.t.....FAILED--expected 57 tests, saw 32

[perlio] -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
     ../ext/threads-shared/t/waithires.t.........................FAILED
         Bad plan.  You planned 57 tests but ran 37.
Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness):
     ../lib/Benchmark.t......................FAILED at test 13

[perlio] -DDEBUGGING -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble
     ../ext/threads-shared/t/waithires.t.........................FAILED
         Bad plan.  You planned 57 tests but ran 37.

[perlio] -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
     ../ext/threads-shared/t/waithires.t.........................FAILED
         Bad plan.  You planned 57 tests but ran 32.

[en_US.utf8] -DDEBUGGING -Duseithreads -Dusemorebits
Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness):
     ../ext/threads-shared/t/waithires.t.....FAILED--expected 57 tests, saw 37

Compiler messages(gcc):
try.c: In function ???main???:
try.c:36: warning: ignoring return value of ???pipe???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
try.c:37: warning: ignoring return value of ???pipe???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
try.c:53: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
try.c:66: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
try.c:72: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
try.c:78: warning: ignoring return value of ???read???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
util.c: In function ???S_write_no_mem???:
util.c:67: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c: In function ???Perl_sv_2pv_flags???:
sv.c:2760: warning: ignoring return value of ???gcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c:2953: warning: ignoring return value of ???gcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c: In function ???Perl_sv_vcatpvfn???:
sv.c:9262: warning: ignoring return value of ???gcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c:10066: warning: ignoring return value of ???gcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
doio.c: In function ???Perl_nextargv???:
doio.c:876: warning: ignoring return value of ???fchown???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
doio.c: In function ???S_exec_failed???:
doio.c:1388: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
perlio.c: In function ???PerlIO_debug???:
perlio.c:517: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
perlio.c: In function ???S_more_refcounted_fds???:
perlio.c:2309: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
Dumper.xs: In function ???DD_dump???:
Dumper.xs:813: warning: format ???%ld??? expects type ???long int???, but argument 2 has type ???U32???
Call.xs: In function ???filter_call???:
Call.xs:63: warning: format ???%d??? expects type ???int???, but argument 3 has type ???STRLEN???
Call.xs:63: warning: format ???%d??? expects type ???int???, but argument 5 has type ???STRLEN???
Call.xs:100: warning: format ???%d??? expects type ???int???, but argument 4 has type ???STRLEN???
Call.xs:156: warning: format ???%d??? expects type ???int???, but argument 3 has type ???STRLEN???
Call.xs:175: warning: format ???%d??? expects type ???int???, but argument 4 has type ???STRLEN???
sdbm.c: In function ???makroom???:
sdbm.c:371: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c:2760: warning: ignoring return value of ???qgcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c:2953: warning: ignoring return value of ???qgcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
sv.c:10066: warning: ignoring return value of ???qgcvt???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
perlio.c:508: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
perlmini.c: In function ???S_init_tls_and_interp???:
perlmini.c:104: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
perl.c: In function ???S_init_tls_and_interp???:
perl.c:104: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
threads.xs: In function ???S_ithread_create???:
threads.xs:693: warning: ignoring return value of ???write???, declared with attribute warn_unused_result

-- 
Report by Test::Smoke v1.39 build 1235 running on perl 5.10.0
(Reporter v0.035 / Smoker v0.044)



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About