Adam Skwersky wrote: > I did not receive any feedback regarding these proposed changes. There is a push going on right now to get the current codebase stable for a 5.10.1 release, so it is likely that no one is available right now who can digest your message and respond cogently. Additionally, your proposed changes are vs 5.8.6, which isn't even the current release on that branch. If you can reproduce the issues on a current 5.8.9 release and retarget your patch to that code, it is far more likely to get someone who knows this corner of the codebase to comment... JohnThread Previous