On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > I'm not sure, but I think it's > > a: publicity for "we have tests". We could just say roughly how many assertions were added. > b: a note that "this regression test is new, so if it fails for you, > and you > didn't see it fail on the previous version, that's not because > something > broke" Well, it *might* be because something broke. > It's only at the level of entire new files. /me shrugs. I don't think most end users will really care. Best, DavidThread Previous | Thread Next