develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2009

Re: Perl 5.10.1

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
David E. Wheeler
Date:
June 24, 2009 09:45
Subject:
Re: Perl 5.10.1
Message ID:
B0D7CD96-66D9-44A3-8F79-9B08B2B8EED7@kineticode.com
On Jun 24, 2009, at 7:39 AM, David Golden wrote:

> But is it really any worse than today in terms of the end result?
> Today everything gets merged willy-nilly and no one knows if things
> are really stable or not.  There's no responsibility for stability --
> it's commit and pray and then the pumpking pays for it.
>
> If a merge proves bad, rip it right back out, chastise the author and
> make them provide more evidence of stability in the future before
> accepting their merges.

I'm completely with you and Aristotle on this stuff. To my mind, the  
project needs a more conservative approach to maintenance. The current  
conservatism is in the wrong place!

Best,

David

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About