Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2009
Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com> [2009-02-26 00:45]:
>> Ok, no problem, make it a dependency.
>
> The point is that if.pm will only try to load the module if the
> conditional is true to begin with. If the conditional’s truth
> implies the presence of the module, it needn’t be an explicit
> dependency.
Good point. But then we're back to the nasty "try to guess who the caller is"
code in dependency.pm.
--
184. When operating a military vehicle I may *not* attempt something
"I saw in a cartoon".
-- The 213 Things Skippy Is No Longer Allowed To Do In The U.S. Army
http://skippyslist.com/list/
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next