develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2009

Re: can MACOS_TRADITIONAL go?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Joshua Juran
Date:
February 17, 2009 16:08
Subject:
Re: can MACOS_TRADITIONAL go?
Message ID:
41EE24F5-407D-4708-8995-CC4237523D30@gmail.com
On Feb 15, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Chris Nandor wrote:

> On Feb 15, 2009, at 12:38, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
>
>> On 15 Feb 2009, at 10:44, Chris Nandor wrote:
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>
>>>> Date: February 15, 2009 10:23:03 PST
>>>> To: Chris Nandor <pudge@perl.org>, Joshua Juran  
>>>> <jjuran@gmail.com>, perl5-porters@perl.org
>>>> Subject: can MACOS_TRADITIONAL go?
>>>>
>>>> There's a fair amount of conditional compilation in the perl  
>>>> core for
>>>> MACOS_TRADITIONAL. Does anyone still use that? Does perl even  
>>>> still build
>>>> on it?
>>>>
>>>> Can we remove it? It would make things simpler.
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't know if there is an active scene of MacOS 9 fanatics  
>> eagerly compiling each new release, but I rather suspect there isn't.

I believe I'm the only one actively maintaining anything resembling a  
perl build for classic Mac OS.  I do intend to advance from 5.6.1 to  
5.8.9 Real Soon Now.

>> As far as I'm concerned, this can be removed.
>
> I'd like to see it left in, personally, but if it causes too much  
> trouble, since I am not maintaining it, and I can't identify any  
> particular users of it, I can't actually make a case for it.  :-)

I don't use it.  Lamp (Lamp ain't Mac POSIX) is essentially a unix  
platform.  For example, dynamic loading would be implemented via  
dlopen().

Josh



Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About