Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2008
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Chip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Either way, shouldn't we be aiming to match the syntax to the semantics
>> in a way that's consistent with Perl 6? In other words require "is copy":
>> sub square ($num is copy) : method {
>
> Well ... that depends on the feasibility of read-only aliases, which I have
> yet to explore.
The ability to parse something as a no-op for future compatibility,
and the ability to make that do something need not be related.
-Chris
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next