Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2008
On Friday 05 December 2008 18:06:45 Ben Morrow wrote: > Quoth chromatic@wgz.org (chromatic): > > On Friday 05 December 2008 14:45:13 Vincent Pit wrote: > > > Maybe I'm a little naive but without it, how pretty the new syntax > > > could be, I don't think it would be enough for experienced users to > > > justify the break in backward compatibility. > > *What* break in backward compatibility? You've completely lost me here. > Presumably the fact that code written using 5.12's method signatures > won't run on 5.10 and earlier. Oh, good. I hope that's the case, because that's an argument so silly I hope never to see it again. Otherwise we might as well all pack up shop here and take up more meaningful hobbies, such as ice fishing. -- cThread Previous | Thread Next