Quoth matt-p5p@trout.me.uk (Matt S Trout): > > I would argue that PL_check mangling is not something we -should- be doing, > and I don't have a problem if it breaks -provided- an alternative API is > added that lets people get at op construction. > > Said new API could even hook -all- ops to get round the PADSV problem (which > I've been shot in the face by once already :) Please. Or just add CHECKOP in all the places it should be but isn't. BenThread Previous | Thread Next