Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{} not ok in double-quotish whenfollowed by > \x100

I am preparing a patch for this problem.  I haven't tried everything 
that Tom pointed out in an earlier email yet, but I have found a problem 
in toke.c.

My current question is I can't figure out a good place to put in a test 
case for this.  It's unicode related, but in a core file.  Please direct me.

• [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{} not ok in double-quotish when followed by > \x100 by karl williamson
• Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{} not ok in double-quotish when followed by > \x100 by Tom Christiansen
• Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{} not ok in double-quotish whenfollowed by > \x100 by karl williamson
• Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{} not ok in double-quotish whenfollowed by > \x100 by karl williamson
• Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{} not ok in double-quotish whenfollowed by > \x100 by karl williamson
• Was Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{}. Now use of blead, git by karl williamson
• Re: Was Re: [perl #59908] \x, \0, and \N{}. Now use of blead, git by David Landgren