On Tue Sep 30 16:33:28 2008, lukeross@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > 2008/9/29 Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@gmail.com>: > > 2008/9/25 Luke Ross <lukeross@gmail.com>: > >> OK sounds reasonable to not change the behaviour of the PUSH sub, but > >> how about not call FETCHSIZE when the push is called in void context? > > > > That optimization seems reasonable to me. I also noticed that UNSHIFT > > could be optimized the same way. > > Here's an updated patch against 5.10 which applies the same to unshift(). > > Luke Thanks! Your patch was applied as change #34908. Steve Peters