Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2008
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> wrote: > I want to note that I'm not enamoured with the choice of `<<>>` > as the operator's glyph, but I have no better proposal and I'm > not overly invested in that bikeshed. As the overcaffeinated fool who suggested that operator, in the ensuing days I have longed for the opportunity to revise my proposed bikeshed color to '>>>' which hopefully will provide neat symmetry with the proposed '<<<TOKEN' which might be just like '<<TOKEN' except strip leading indentation (like ksh's '<<-)' anyway after learning of the possibility of altering the filenames as tchrist has pointed out and which used to be inthe faq before the 3-arg open craze, I no longer think wide football is a good idea, under any syntax. (has it been a straw man all along?)Thread Previous | Thread Next