On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 08:45:13PM -0700, Father Chrysostomos wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:41 AM, brian d foy wrote: > > >In article <200807241628.m6OGSxCq018603@pause.perl.org>, Perl Authors > >Upload Server <upload@pause.perl.org> wrote: > > > >>The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: > >> > >> modid: constant::private > >> DSLIP: bdppp > >> description: Pragma for making constants lexical > >> userid: SPROUT (Father Chrysostomos) > >> chapterid: 27 (Pragma) > >> communities: > > > >Should this be constant::lexical? > > Quite right. I think that’s a much better name. > > >Also, have you discussed this on p5p? > >They normally control the names for pragmas. > > Does anyone have any objection to this? You appear to be warnocked. But I like the name, at least. Maybe somebody with more authority can say they do as well :) -- Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project? Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/ Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform? http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/