On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 10:05:33AM -0500, David Nicol wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez > > That's known. I think Dave has plans to fix that (but it won't be > > completely trivial). > > so there's more to it than incrementing the refcount on lexicals > encountered within ??{...} and maintaining a list of same to decrement > when the regex goes out of scope? Yes. -- Now is the discount of our winter tent -- sign seen outside camping shopThread Previous