Re: [PATCH] readable assertion names, now the rest

>> With this patch the type of failed variable is obvious without
>> grepping the code.

And now for the rest.

PS: I'm fully aware that I mix up macroname with parameter name.
However the assertion parameter is just a funky name for the context
in this case. (the "caller")

assertion "isGV_with_GP(_gvstash)" failed: file "B.c", line 4990
says GvSTASH fails with the isGV_with_GP assertion.
-- 
Reini Urban

• Re: [PATCH] readable assertion names, now the rest by Reini Urban
• Re: [PATCH] readable assertion names, now the rest by Reini Urban
• Re: [PATCH] readable assertion names, now the rest by Rafael Garcia-Suarez