On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez > That's known. I think Dave has plans to fix that (but it won't be > completely trivial). so there's more to it than incrementing the refcount on lexicals encountered within ??{...} and maintaining a list of same to decrement when the regex goes out of scope? or is that exactly it and is not completely trivial.Thread Previous | Thread Next