On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:23:00PM +0200, Steffen Mueller wrote: > Hi p5p, hi Tim, Your message had a "Newsgroups: perl.perl5.porters" line but I'm not sure if that's a two-way gateway. It may not have reached the actual mailing list, so I'm CC'ing this reply. > since the lib.pm that ships with any released perl still warns on "use > lib 'foo.par'", I'd like to see (or make) a CPAN release of it so I can > depend on that from PAR. > > Attached is a patch against Maintainers.pl to add me as maintainer for > lib/lib_pm.PL and lib/lib.t. Feel free to remove me. Ancient history. I don't even remeber contributing to it. > Tim, you're listed as the author of the module, do you have any > objections to having a separate CPAN release? If not, would you like to > do that or should I? I've no objection to lib.pm becoming dual-life, but since I've no wish to maintain it that doesn't actually count for much :) > Does anybody else have gripes with this plan? For the record, Nicholas > said he had no objections to this on IRC. > > Best regards, > Steffen > > P.S.: Yes, I know I'd have to do some magic during the installation of > the tentative module from CPAN to have the same behaviour as the lib.pm > that was built with perl. I'm working on it. Tim.Thread Previous | Thread Next