On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:48:30 +0200, David Landgren <david@landgren.net> wrote: > Compiling perl (5.10.x) with gcc <= 3.2.3 > > After sparring with the RT bug database, Bram began to install as many > versions of "gcc" as he could lay his hands on, to see how they fared > compiling perl. > > When he got as far back as version 3.2.3, the "Configure" and "make" > succeeded, but the test suite spat out numerous "libgcc_s.so.1: cannot > open shared object file" errors. > > Andy Dougherty suggested a riff on the "-fstack-protector" problems > seen elsewhere this week, but that didn't do any better. Since the > compiler in question was released five years ago, Andy suggested just > adding a note in the INSTALL file. > > H.Merijn Brand committed change #33841 to note the fact in > README.linux, but wasn't really happy with the idea, since gcc runs on > other platforms as well. But that's ok, because he will have to revert > the change, since Bram figured out a simple recipe that allows 3.2.3 > to work. > > http://xrl.us/bkyta Well, does it need to be reverted? Or does it need some more generic comment somewhere else? -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, & 11.23, SuSE 10.1 & 10.2, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/Thread Previous | Thread Next