Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2008
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 07:00:03AM -0700, H. Merijn Brand wrote: > Change 33843 by merijn@merijn-nb09 on 2008/05/17 13:56:26 > > Subject: [perl #54120] [PATCH] [metaconfig] Need more -fstack-protector > From: Andy Dougherty (via RT) <perlbug-followup@perl.org> > Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 09:37:07 -0700 > Message-ID: <rt-3.6.HEAD-9992-1210696625-331.54120-75-0@perl.org> > @@ -5258,6 +5258,10 @@ > case "$ccflags" in > *-posix*) dflt="$dflt -posix" ;; > esac > + # See note above about -fstack-protector > + case "$ccflags" in > + *-fstack-protector*) dflt="$dflt -fstack-protector" ;; > + esac > ;; > *) dflt="$ldflags";; > esac this isn't perfect, because it's in this: : flags used in final linking phase case "$ldflags" in '') if ./venix; then dflt='-i -z' else dflt='' fi case "$ccflags" in *-posix*) dflt="$dflt -posix" ;; esac # See note above about -fstack-protector case "$ccflags" in *-fstack-protector*) dflt="$dflt -fstack-protector" ;; esac ;; *) dflt="$ldflags";; esac I find that as soon as I use -Aldflags, I don't get -fstack-protector added. Which is somewhat daft, at least as an "end user", as I was using *A* not *D*. I don't understand the implementation of Configure enough to know when -A processing is done, but is it done early enough that ldflags is already set by the time that that code above is reached? Nicholas ClarkThread Next