2008/5/10 chromatic <chromatic@wgz.org>: > Per a TODO in pod/perltodo.pod, here's a patch that adds the yada, yada, yada > operators. It includes documentation and a test file (attached, not part of > the patch). Woot. > As Ben Morrow points out, this version has a slight incompatibility with the > match operator ?? nestled up against the ternary conditional operator without > intervening whitespace. I suspect that a bit of opcode rewriting would work, > if there's sufficient lookhead... but that's more work than I want to do at > the moment. I don't see an easy way out for this one. But that's the kind of incompatibility we can live with. (Like the incompatibility with applying three times the negation operator to a term.)Thread Previous