Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2008
Quoting Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 06:44:09PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > >> Do the appended tests codify the behaviour we desire? >> Anything I've missed that would be necessary to nail down this behaviour? > > I was rather hoping that *someone* might answer these questions, because > I wanted to commit the TODO tests to core and suggest them for a bounty from > the Vienna.pm programme. But who do you expect to answer these question? Was there a consensus on how it should behave? Reading the thread I don't feel there was one... > But I guess that everyone is rather too busy doing other things these days, > so we might as well all give up on maintaining Perl 5 and go and do something > more rewarding. > > > Shame about anyone whose livelihood relies on Perl. But they don't seem to > rate it that highly, else they'd speak up. I rather feel that no one is preapred (or feels qualified) to make a decission on when it should and when it shouldn't warn and therfor stays silent. The thread contains different views with regards to the warning(s). Kind regards, BramThread Previous | Thread Next