[PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t (was RE: [perl #53482] Ibelieve I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug.)

>> I don't know which source code change changed this behaviour.
>
> See patch 27633 which introduced a test marking that the READONLY   
> bug had been fixed, but I counted tell which source code change had   
> fixed it.
>

Attached patch adds 3 tests to make sure the output stays the same.


Kind regards,

Bram

• [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by manchicken @ manchicken . com
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS thatmight actually be a guts bug. by Bram
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS thatmight actually be a guts bug. by Bram
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Nicholas Clark
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR
• [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t (was RE: [perl #53482] Ibelieve I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug.) by Bram
• Re: [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t (was RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug.) by Steve Peters
• Re: [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t by Bram
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker