RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug.

From: Nicholas Clark [mailto:nick@flirble.org]On 
> The upcoming 5.8.9 will have the same behaviour as 5.10.
> I don't know which source code change changed this behaviour.

See patch 27633 which introduced a test marking that the READONLY bug had been fixed, but I counted tell which source code change had fixed it.

Robin

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
privileged material; it is for the intended addressee(s) only.
If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or
disclose such information.

NPL Management Ltd cannot guarantee that the e-mail or any
attachments are free from viruses.

NPL Management Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. No: 2937881
Registered Office: Serco House, 16 Bartley Wood Business Park,
                   Hook, Hampshire, United Kingdom  RG27 9UY
-------------------------------------------------------------------

• [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by manchicken @ manchicken . com
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS thatmight actually be a guts bug. by Bram
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS thatmight actually be a guts bug. by Bram
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Nicholas Clark
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker
• Re: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR
• [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t (was RE: [perl #53482] Ibelieve I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug.) by Bram
• Re: [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t (was RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug.) by Steve Peters
• Re: [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/tie.t by Bram
• RE: [perl #53482] I believe I found a bug with Readonly::XS that might actually be a guts bug. by Robin Barker