Re: [perl #45383] RE: missing tests for sprintf %f with Nan/+Inf/-Inf? (was: sprintf %f panics with NaN)

Bram via RT wrote:
>Were they added elsewhere? Or were there any problems with the test 
>idea?
>Or weren't tests added because of a lack of time/patch?

As far as I know, no one got around to it.  My mail records don't include
any reply to the message from me that you quoted.  I suggest you make
a patch.

-zefram

• [perl #45383] RE: missing tests for sprintf %f with Nan/+Inf/-Inf? (was: sprintf %f panics with NaN) by Bram via RT
• Re: [perl #45383] RE: missing tests for sprintf %f with Nan/+Inf/-Inf? (was: sprintf %f panics with NaN) by Zefram
• [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/sprintf2.t (was Re: [perl #45383] RE:missing tests for sprintf %f with Nan/+Inf/-Inf? (was: sprintf %fpanics with NaN)) by Bram
• Re: [PATCH] extra tests for t/op/sprintf2.t (was Re: [perl #45383] RE: missing tests for sprintf %f with Nan/+Inf/-Inf? (was: sprintf %f panics with NaN)) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez