Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2008
2008/4/26 Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>:
> Some modules started to use different typemap entries to work around this
> issue, for example:
>
> void LOG (utf8_string msg)
>
> T_OCTETS
> $var = SvPVbyte_nolen ($arg)
>
> T_UTF8 // == utf8_string
> $var = SvPVutf8_nolen ($arg)
>
> Unfortunately, unlike other, similar, functions (like SvIV, SvPV etc.), this
> easily destroys the scalar value:
>
> LOG ("see this object:");
> LOG ($obj);
> # $obj no longer an object here, it became a string
You mean, like "Class=HASH(0xDEADBEEF)", I suppose (I haven't checked).
> So unlike other accessor functions such as SvPV, SvPVutf8 changes the
> contents of the SV in a very visible way (while SvIV doesn't destroy the
> string, for example).
>
> I can understand why it does so, but the problem is, there is simply no good
> way to deal with utf-8 in XS as the API is extremely hostile at the moment.
>
> To get it right, I think one has to do something like this (this can be
> optimised of course, but that makes it even more complicated):
>
> T_UTF8
> $var = SvPVutf8_nolen (sv_mortalcopy ($arg))
>
> I think the situation with unicode and cpan perl modules cannot improve
> as long as it so difficult to do somethign as simple as get at the string
> data in a non-random/godgiven encoding.
That's right, and that's probably also why people find it difficult to
handle utf-8 in perl as soon as they begin using XS modules.
I think that this screams for a new macro which would be more or less
the one you suggested here, maybe implemented in a more efficient way if
possible.
> Also, even though it is 5.10 now, it should be *seriously* considered to
> replace the almost completely useless char * typemap entry by something
> that gives you octets (preferably non-destructively). Or somebody explain
> to me when "char *" does something useful in current perl versions without
> tinkering with retesting ST(x) manually...
You mean this one ?
T_PV
$var = ($type)SvPV_nolen($arg)
Here, the result would be dependent on the internal representation of
the string in perl, so I suppose you would like to change this to
something that uses SvPVbyte. I wonder, however, how much code would
break with that change. Actually I suspect that more code would be fixed
than breaked, but that's a wild intuition...
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next