On Thursday 20 March 2008 00:00:13 Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:23:25PM -0500, Steve Peters wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > > > > > What would Devel::Cover think? (being a useful piece of code that it > > > would be bad to break) > > > > There are some things (ternary operator and for/foreach) that cause > > Devel::Cover some mistranslation. Whether it would cause other > > problems, I can't really say. > > I suspect that if B::Deparse can be made to work then I can cope in > Devel::Cover. There's already some fairly hairy stuff in there - who > will notice a little more? > > I suppose that's the price to be paid for writing code that lives > outside of the core whilst maintaining a rather incestuous relationship > with the core itself. > Is that a good reason to move Devel::Cover into the core? -- Richard Foley Ciao - shorter than aufwiedersehen http://www.rfi.net/Thread Previous | Thread Next