Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2007
On 4/24/07, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/24/07, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:08:28AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 23:17 -0700, Joshua ben Jore wrote: > > > > Aren't there some OSes like Red Hat which frequently ship with > > > > Scalar::Util minus the XS portions like weaken and blessed? > > > > > > Yes, > > > <checks other laptop> Mandrake Linux 9.2 did as well. > > > > Then they are buggy. > > Not us. > > Thank you. My thoughts exactly. Removing XS implementations of core > modules is a seriously stupid thing to do and any distro which does so > deserves to handle all the bug reports themselves. > Agreed. In any case Scalar::Util has pure perl blessed, so the breakage they'd be dealing with is just relatively meaningless Dynaloader test failure if they did it again with the new perl, right? Attached is a new patch based on Joshua's comments which also fixes up the Dynaloader test breakage by just adding List::Util as one of the things it tests loading. -- BrandonThread Previous | Thread Next