develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2007

Re: object_compatibility

Thread Previous
Rafael Garcia-Suarez
March 25, 2007 02:19
Re: object_compatibility
Message ID:
On 23/03/07, Nicholas Clark <> wrote:
> As it hasn't been changed since, and there doesn't seem to be an issue with
> reserved space on the end of the perl interpreter object, is it sensible to
> drop it?

As far as I can tell, the contents of this struct are never used or
set (except to 0 after malloc), so it could make sense to make the
definition be the same with and without threads.

Thread Previous Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About