Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2007
From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez
March 25, 2007 02:19
Message ID: email@example.com
On 23/03/07, Nicholas Clark <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> As it hasn't been changed since, and there doesn't seem to be an issue with
> reserved space on the end of the perl interpreter object, is it sensible to
> drop it?
As far as I can tell, the contents of this struct are never used or
set (except to 0 after malloc), so it could make sense to make the
definition be the same with and without threads.